Filed: Jun. 29, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 430 F.2d 957 SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION, INC. and Subscription Television of California, Inc., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, and The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, Respondents, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THEATRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. 25626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 29, 1970. Max L. Gellam (argued), John R. Light, of Latham & Wa
Summary: 430 F.2d 957 SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION, INC. and Subscription Television of California, Inc., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, and The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, Respondents, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THEATRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. 25626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 29, 1970. Max L. Gellam (argued), John R. Light, of Latham & Wat..
More
430 F.2d 957
SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION, INC. and Subscription Television of
California, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, and The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States
District Judge for the Central District of California,
Respondents, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THEATRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION
et al., Real Parties in Interest.
No. 25626.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 29, 1970.
Max L. Gellam (argued), John R. Light, of Latham & Watkins of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
William M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Manuel L. Real, USDJ, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Allan Albala (argued) and Harry G. Swerdlow (argued), of Swerdlow, Glickbarg & Shimer, Beverly Hills, Cal., for real parties in interest.
Before BROWNING, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Petitioner asks review of a discovery order. There is no showing of irreparable injury. Cf. Hartley Pen Co. v. United States District Court, 287 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1961).
